After southern border tour, Tester sold on need for technology, not wall
Sen. Jon Tester will use his position on a key U.S. Senate subcommittee to push for better use of technology and manpower over a costly wall on the southern border, he said Tuesday.
Fresh off a tour of the border, Tester brought home a number of concerns, including substandard living conditions for immigrant detainees and the loss of more than 1 million acres in Texas due to the proposed location of the wall.
Tester said the wall continues to dominate debate in Congress.
“The debate on how to secure our borders led to a costly government shutdown,” he said during a media call. “And now the president is unilaterally bypassing Congress to take money from our military construction to build a wall on the southern border.”
The Pentagon last week released a list of U.S. military construction projects that could be lost as the White House redirects funds to build a border wall. The missile maintenance facility at Malmstrom Air Force Base and the Montana Air National Guard’s C-130 aircraft apron are both on the list.
During his border tour, Tester met with Customs and Border protection officials, along with local farmers and ranchers. He also toured two ports of entry and visited the nation’s largest immigration processing center in McAllen, Texas.
The facility houses 800 people, he said.
“It was a gut-wrenching sight,” he said. “I saw not only men but women and children in conditions that were as humane as they possibly could be, but still left a lot to the imagination. Eight hundred people is 200 more people than live in the town of Big Sandy, all in an 80- by 100-foot area. It breaks your heart.”
Tester also questioned the use of funds allocated by Congress to expand the McAllen facility in the Fiscal Year 2017 budget. That funding wasn’t used for its assigned purpose, he said.
“Questions were asked about what happened to the $30 million, and we didn’t get an answer,” he said. “It won’t be the last time we ask that question. We’re going to get the answers, but the bottom line is, where’s the money going?”
Last month, a seven-member Senate committee, including Tester, passed a bipartisan spending bill that included $1.37 billion for 55 miles of border fencing and other technological enhancements.
The Trump administration followed by declaring a national emergency to secure additional funding for 200 miles of border wall. Tester said local farmers and ranchers, one who stands to lose 500 acres of irrigated crop land south of the proposed wall, are against the wall and are pressing for other options.
“In some cases, this wall is a mile away from the Rio Grande, and sometimes it’s right on it,” Tester said. “It would isolate 1.1 million acres in Texas alone. It doesn’t solve the problem of people coming across the Rio Grande and getting on U.S. soil.”
Sen. Steve Daines also toured the border in February and said he witnessed immigrants crossing into the U.S. He said meth and other drugs produced by Mexican cartels are flooding Montana cities and “tearing communities apart.”
Tester said modern technology would have more impact than an antiquated wall in stopping drugs and illegal immigration. A wall “from sea to shining sea” would be ineffective and a poor use of taxpayer dollars, he said.
“It’s very obvious we need to use every tool in our tool box, whether it’s technology, manpower or fencing where it makes sense,” Tester said. “We need to take a look at some of our existing laws and take a closer look at where the money Congress has already appropriated went.”